Canonical Syntax: A Strategy for Constructing Linguistic Politeness Among Generation Z
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1604.24Keywords:
canonical syntax, language politeness, Generation Z, pragmatics, Indonesian languageAbstract
Linguistic politeness is a crucial dimension in maintaining social harmony, particularly for Generation Z (Gen Z), who are known to have communication styles distinct from previous generations. This study aims to formulate the concept of canonical syntax in Indonesian as a strategy to foster politeness in Gen Z’s language use. Canonical syntax is understood as sentence forms that can be safely employed across formal and informal contexts without posing face-threatening acts. Adopting a mixed-method approach, the study combines a literature-based conceptual analysis with a survey of 165 Gen Z respondents aged 18–23 in Jakarta. The research identifies eleven canonical syntactic forms in Indonesian: (1) the addition of the particle -lah, (2) the phatic particle ya, (3) vocative nouns, (4) lexical directives such as coba, tolong, silakan, mohon, (try, help, please/go ahead, kindly) (5) mitigative adverbs such as sepertinya (it seems), sebaiknya (should, it would be better if), sekiranya (if/in case), (6) modality, (7) the use of the pronoun saya (I, I am, me) as subject or object, (8) omission of the clitic -mu (you), (9) conditional clauses, (10) transformation from active to passive, and (11) transformation from imperative to interrogative. These eleven forms were employed as survey instruments to measure Gen Z’s perceptions. Findings reveal that most respondents evaluated canonical syntax as polite. However, in actual communication, they more frequently employed non-canonical rather than canonical forms. This indicates a gap between normative awareness and communicative habits. Practically, the study provides a pedagogical foundation for Indonesian language education to cultivate a generation that is both communicative and polite.
References
Anwar, M., Amir, F. R., Herlina, Anoegrajekti, N., & Muliastuti, L. (2021). Language Impoliteness among Indonesians on Twitter. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 37(4), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.17576/JKMJC-2021-3704-10
Anwar, Miftahulkhairah. (2024). Sintaksis, Memahami Kalimat Perspketif Fungsi [Syntax, Understanding Sentences Perspective of Function]. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Bridges, Judith. (2017). Gendering metapragmatics in online discourse: “Mansplaining man gonna mansplain…”. Discourse, Context & Media, 20, 94-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2017.09.010
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Chendeb, H. (2019). Linguistic politeness across Arabic, French, and English languages. The Arts and Social Sciences Journal, 5(2), 83–96. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341098129
Crystal, D. (2008). Txtng: The Gr8 Db8. Oxford University Press.
Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 349-367. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(95)00014-3
Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. UK: Cambridge University Press.
Culpeper, J. V., & Hardaker, C. (2017). Impoliteness. In J. Culpeper et al. (Eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Linguistic (Im)politeness (pp. 199–225). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-37508-7
Danesi, M. (2017). The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Dynel, M. (2023). Lessons in linguistics with Chat GPT: Metapragmatics, metacommunication, metadiscourse and metalanguage in human-AI interactions. Language & Communication, 93, 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2023.09.002
Fotaleno, F., & Batubara, D. S. (2024). Fenomena Kesulitan Generasi Z dalam Mendapatkan Pekerjaan ditinjau Perspektif Teori Kesenjangan Generasi. Jurnal Syntax Admiration, 5(8). https://doi.org/10.46799/jsa.v5i8.1513 https://jurnalsyntaxadmiration.com/index.php/jurnal/article/view/1513
Hames, S., Haugh, M., & Musgrave, S. (2025). “How is that unparliamentary?”: The metapragmatics of ‘unparliamentary’ language in the Australian Federal Parliament. Journal Lingua, 320, 103932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2025.103932
Hapsari, R. N., Agustina, S., Wijaya, R., & Romadona, M. R. (2024). Kurangnya Keterampilan Komunikasi Generasi Z Memasuki Pasar Kerja. Jurnal Pekommas, 9(1), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.56873/jpkm.v9i1.5241
Ji, L. (2021). When politeness processing encounters failed syntactic/semantic processing. Acta Psychologica, 219, Article 103391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2021.103391
Kasman, N. (2021, August). Penanda kesantunan berbahasa pada masyarakat Bugis di Kabupaten Sidenreng Rappang Provinsi Sulawesi Selatan. Paper presented at the International Congress of the Linguistic Society of Indonesia (KIMLI), Makassar, Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/366955126
Kurniawan, N. (2024). Ujaran Kebencian di Media Sosial yang Terjadi di Kalangan Generasi Z. Kompasiana 4 Desember 2024. Available at https://www.kompasiana.com/nauvalkurniawan6379/67502ba834777c3a825c8e63/ujaran-kebencian-di-media-sosial-yang-terjadi-di-kalangan-generasi-z
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Mulyono, Kusumaningsih, D., Mukhzamilah, Yuliyanto, A., Rhubido, D., & Cahyo, A. A. R. (2025). The Functions of Vulgar Language in Basa Suroboyoan During Social Interactions Within Urban Communities. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 15(8), 2759-2769. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1508.34
Naait, S. A., & Alshemmery, I. M. (2024). A Metapragmatic Analysis of Iraqi and American Political Legal Discourse. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 15(1), 56-76. https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol15no1.5
Pandang, A., Umar, N. F., Mantasiah, M., Arifyadi, A., & Amirullah, M. (2024). Factors Influencing the Language Politeness Behavior of The Z Generation. Bulletin of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 6(1).
Portner, P., Pak, M., & Zanuttini, R. (2019). The speaker–addressee relation at the syntax–semantics interface. Language, 95(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2019.0008
Salsabil, R. D., & Ningsih, R. (2023). Kesantunan Berbahasa Warganet Dalam Kolom Komentar Instagram @ Jokowi ‘Ruang Cakap Digital.’ Konfiks: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra dan Pengajaran, 10(1), 44–54. https://doi.org/10.26618/konfiks.v10i1.10770
Saputro, E. P. N., Widiarti, P. W., Handayani, W., & Ekawati, R. (2025). The perception of Generation Z on communication ethics in information dissemination through social media. Journal of Social Studies (JSS), 21(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.21831/jss.v21i1.83936
Setiawan, A. (2025). The speech politeness of Z-Generation in the digital era. English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (ELTALL), 7(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.21154/eltall.v7i1.10792
Shahid S. (2025). The pragmatics of encouragement: An inquiry into defaults vis-à-vis inferences. Journal of Pragmatics, 237, 97-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2025.01.013
Singh, R., Singh, K. K., & Kundra, S. (2024). Negative and positive politeness strategies in the syntactic structures and hedging devices used in conversation in Bua Fiji Hindi. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2024.2424605
Subbarao, K. V., Agnihotri, R. K., & Mukherjee, A. (2021). Syntactic strategies and politeness phenomena. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 1991(92), 35-54. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl.1991.92.35
Taliwuna, M. (2024). Strategi Pendidikan Moral dalam Menghadapi Tantangan Digitalisasi Bagi Generasi Z. Shamayim. Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristiani, 3(2), 45-64. https://ejournal.stt-yerusalembaru.ac.id/index.php/SHAMAYIM
Trotzke, A. (2024). Towards a social syntax. Lingua, 291, 103500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2023.103500
Verschueren, J. (1999). Understanding Pragmatics. London: Arnold.
Zaman, S. N. (2024). Survey Deloitte: Kekhawatiran Gen Z dalam Hidup. Akademik. Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis, 4(1), 54–62. https://ojs.pseb.or.id/index.php/jmh/article/view/658
