Wabo Language in Wabompi Village: Evaluation of Language Vitality and Endangerment

Authors

  • Satwiko Budiono Universitas Indonesia
  • Frans Asisi Datang Universitas Indonesia
  • Sri Munawarah Universitas Indonesia
  • Katubi National Research and Innovation Agency

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1604.15

Keywords:

language vitality, language use, local language, Wabo language, sociolinguistics

Abstract

The Wabo language in East Yapen District, Yapen Islands Regency, Papua Province, is generally no longer used in daily communication. Of the 10 villages in East Yapen District, only the Wabo people in Wabompi Village continue to maintain their traditional performance culture. Accordingly, this study evaluates the vitality and use of the Wabo language in Wabompi Village to identify the correlation between the vitality status of a language and the maintenance of its distinctive performance culture. Furthermore, the study investigates language use in the social and family domains. The methodology employed qualitative methods, including evaluation analysis of vitality and language use in the field of sociolinguistics. Language vitality was evaluated based on vitality indicators from UNESCO and SIL International. Data was collected using participatory and direct observation. The results reveal that the vitality status of the Wabo language in Wabompi Village is definitely endangered according to UNESCO vitality indicators. Meanwhile, the condition of the Wabo language vitality in Wabompi is in a moribund state according to SIL International. In terms of language use, Wabompi is used only by the grandparents, and the most common language used is Indonesian.

Author Biographies

Satwiko Budiono, Universitas Indonesia

Department of Linguistics

Frans Asisi Datang, Universitas Indonesia

Department of Linguistics

Sri Munawarah, Universitas Indonesia

Department of Linguistics

Katubi, National Research and Innovation Agency

Research Center for Language and Literature Preservation

References

Anceaux, J. C. (1961). The Linguistic Situation in the Islands of Yapen, Kurudu, Nau, and Miosnum, New Guinea. BRILLIANT. Retrieved June 10, 2025, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1163/j.ctvbqs3fs.1

Anderbeck, K. (2015). Portraits of Language Vitality in Indonesia. In I. Wayan Arka, N. L. N. S. Malini, & I. A. M. Puspani (Eds.), Language documentation and cultural practices in the Austronesian world (Issue 4, pp. 19–47). Pacific Linguistics.

BPS Statistics, Indonesia. (2018). Potential village survey. Central Bureau of Statistics.

Candrasari, R., & Nurmaida. (2018). Language Vitality Measurement Model. Sefa Bumi Persada.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Eberhard, D. M., Simons, G. F., & Fennig, C. D. (Eds.). (2024). Ethnologue: Languages of the World (24th ed.). SIL International. http://www.ethnologue.com

Gunawan, A. (2002). Language Usage Research Guidelines. Language Center, Department of National Education.

Hadiwijaya, M., Kinanti, K., & Puspitasari, I. (2022). Youths and Indigenous Language: Assessing Javanese Krama Madya Language Vitality. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 11(3), 397–406. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v11i3.44545

Hanawalt, C., Varenkamp, B., Roche, C., & Eberhard, D. (2015). A Guide for Planning the Future of Our Language (H. Hanawalt, Ed.; Preliminar). SIL International. http://www.leadimpact.org/language#the-future-of-our-language

Holmes, J., & Wilson, N. (2022). Language choice in multilingual communities. An Introduction to Sociolinguistics (pp. 23–73). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367821852-3

Lee, N. H., & Van Way, J. R. (2018). Assessing the Degree of Language Endangerment. In K. L. Rehg & L. Campbell (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Endangered Languages (pp. 47–65). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190610029.013.5

Lewis, M. P., & Simons, G. F. (2010). Assessing Endangerment: Expanding Fishman’s GIDS. Revue Roumaine de Linguistique, LV(2), 103–120. Retrieved 1 June, 2025, from https://www.lingv.ro/RRL-2010.html

National Agency for Language Development and Cultivation. (2019). Language and Language Map in Indonesia (6th ed.). National Agency for Language Development and Cultivation, Ministry of Education and Culture.

National Agency for Language Development and Cultivation. (2022). Technical Guidelines for Language Vitality Studies in 2022. Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology.

Pramuniati, I., Mahriyuni, M., & Syarfina, T. (2024). Vitality of Malay Language in North Sumatra, Indonesia. Research Journal of Advanced Humanities, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.58256/h2vqkg98

Rhodes, R., & Campbell, L. (2018). Goals for Language Documentation. In K. L. Rehg & L. Campbell (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Endangered Languages (pp. 106-122). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190610029.013.7

Rumpedai, R. (2021). Influence of Indonesian Use on the Wabo Language in the Wabo Society Community in Wabo Village, East Yapen District, Yapen Islands Regency, Papua Province. University of Papua.

Sallabank, J., & Austin, P. K. (2022). Endangered Languages. In ZH Li Wei & J. Simpson (Eds.), Routledge’s Handbook of Applied Linguistics (2nd edition). Routledge.

Sibua, S., Wahyuni, S., & Kusumaningtyas, A. (2023). Vitality of the Ternate Language on Hiri Island. Scientific Journal of Wahana Pendidikan, 9(2), 600–607. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7584747

Syarfina, T., & Budiono, S. (2022). Comparison of Language and Administrative Maps in the Yapen Islands Regency, Papua Province. TALENTA Conference Series: Local Wisdom, Social, and Arts, 5(2), 187–196.

Taher, M. D. S., Oktaviani, V. D., Dewanda, K., Yosafat, V., & Firmonasari, A. (2022). Language preservation parameter: Assessment of Bengkulu Malay language vitality using the level endangerment index. Tradition and Modernity of Humanity, 2(2), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.32734/tmh.v2i2.10133

Tamrin, Budiono, S., & Nazarudin. (2024). The Vitality of the Wabo Language in Wabo Village. Indonesian Linguistics, 42(1), 247–270. https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v42i1.558

Tamrin, T., Haliq, A., Marzuki, A. G., Fatinah, S., & Asri, B. M. (2024). Vitality of the Lauje Language Enclave in the Family Domain of the Tolitoli Regency. RETORIKA: Journal of Language, Literature and Teaching, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v17i1.58857

UNESCO. (2003). Language vitality and danger UNESCO Ad hoc Expert Group on Endangered Language.

Voorhoeve, C. L. (1975). Languages in the Irian Jaya Checklist: Preliminary Classification, Language Maps, and Wordlists. Australian National Universities.

Wagiati, W., Wahya, W., & Riyanto, S. (2017). The Vitality of the Sundanese Language in the Bandung Regency. LITERA, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v16i2.14357

Yapen Islands Regency Government. (2018). The Main Ideas of the Yapen Islands Regency Culture. Yapen Islands Regency Government.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-01

Issue

Section

Articles