Thematic Structure in British and Saudi English Opinion Articles: A Comparative Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1604.09Keywords:
contrastive rhetoric, intercultural communication, persuasive discourse, Saudi English, thematic structureAbstract
Drawing on Systemic Functional Linguistics and Intercultural Rhetoric frameworks, this comparative analysis reveals distinct cross-cultural patterns in the thematic structure of British and Saudi English opinion articles. Saudi authors exhibit a strong preference for unmarked topical themes (90.2%) and linear thematic progression (71.1%), aligning with Arabic rhetorical traditions of direct presentation and sequential argumentation. Conversely, British writers employ significantly more marked themes (18.9%) and constant progression (42.0%), consistent with British rhetorical conventions of contextual framing and cumulative argument development. These findings illuminate how cultural rhetorical traditions manifest in English-medium persuasion while demonstrating writers' strategic adaptations to genre conventions, including the suppression of culturally preferred patterns (e.g., derived progression) due to journalistic demands for brevity. The study contributes to understanding intercultural communication in global Englishes and offers practical insights for pedagogy, translation, and media discourse analysis.
References
Abduljawad, S. (2020). The syntax-pragmatics interface in L2: Aspects of information structure [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Salford. Retrieved July 25, 2025, from https://shorturl.at/CAxJw
Abdul Ridha, N. S. (2014). Theme and rheme: Types and problems in EFL university students' written texts. Journal of Basra Researches for Human Sciences, 39(1), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.33900/bhrhs.39.1.2014.005
Abu Radwan, A. (2012). Rhetoric transfer in L2 writing: The role of second language proficiency. Arab World English Journal, 3(2), 365–399. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol3no2.26
Alharbi, M. A. (2019). Saudi Arabia EFL university students’ voice on challenges and solutions in learning academic writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 576–587. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i3.15276
Alharbi, N. (2023). A rhetorical structural analysis of introductions in L2 Saudi students’ argumentative essays. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 13(4), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.36941/jesr-2023-0093
Alkhateeb, A. (2018). Dynamic transfer and relations between first language (L1) proficiency and second language (L2) writing skills performance. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 9(4), 324–336. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no4.24
Alotaibi, H. S. (2020). The thematic structure in research article abstracts: Variations across disciplines. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1756146
Alrajhi, M. (2020). Thematization in native and nonnative medical discourse: A systemic functional approach. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 2(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v2i2.270
Alyousef, H. S. (2021). Structure of research article abstracts in political science: A genre-based study. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211040797
Alyousef, H. S., & Alzahrani, A. A. (2020). A functional analysis of the thematic organization in electrical engineering research article introductions written in English by native and Saudi scholars: A comparative study. Arab World English Journal, 11(2), 114–141. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no2.9
Chang, P., & Lee, M. (2019). Exploring textual and interpersonal themes in the expository essays of college students of different linguistic backgrounds. English for Specific Purposes, 54, 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2019.01.002
Clyne, M. (1987). Discourse structures and discourse expectations: Implications for Anglo-German academic communication in English. In L. E. Smith (Ed.), Discourses across cultures: Strategies in World English (pp. 73–83). Prentice Hall.
Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric: Cross-cultural aspects of second language writing. Cambridge University Press.
Connor, U. (2011). Intercultural rhetoric in the writing classroom. University of Michigan Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Daneš, F. (1974). Functional sentence perspective and the organization of the text. In F. Daneš (Ed.), Papers on functional sentence perspective (pp. 106–128). Academia.
Dong, T., Shao, P., & Jia, J. (2016). The study on thematic progression patterns of English news. English Linguistics Research, 5(3), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.5430/elr.v5n3p15
Dontcheva-Navratilova, O. (2020). Persuasion in academic discourse: Metadiscourse as a means of persuasion in Anglophone and Czech linguistics and economics research articles. In O. Dontcheva-Navratilova, M. Adam, R. Povolná, & R. Vogel (Eds.), Persuasion in specialised discourses (pp. 121–158). Palgrave Macmillan.
Drid, T. (2014). Exploring the use of through-argumentation and counter-argumentation in Arabic-speaking EFL learners’ argumentative essays. Arab World English Journal, 5(4), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol5no4.23
Ebrahimi, S. F. (2016). Theme types and patterns in research article abstracts: A cross-disciplinary study. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 4(3), 104–115. https://doi.org/10.24415/ijelts.2016.25066
Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). Continuum.
Fries, P. H. (1981). On the status of theme in English: Arguments from discourse. Forum Linguisticum, 6(1), 1–38.
Gunawan, W., & Aziza, F. (2017). Theme and thematic progression of undergraduate thesis: Investigating meaning making in academic writing. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(2), 413–424. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v7i2.8350
Halliday, M. A. K. (2014). Introduction to functional grammar: Revised by Christian M. I. M. Matthiessen (4th ed.). Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). Arnold.
Hatim, B., & Mason, I. (1997). The translator as communicator. Routledge.
Hinds, J. (1987). Reader versus writer responsibility: A new typology. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 141–152). Addison-Wesley.
Hinkel, E. (2004). Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. Routledge.
Ho, V. (2011). Non-native argumentative writing by Vietnamese learners of English: A contrastive study [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Georgetown University. Retrieved July 22, 2025, from https://hdl.handle.net/10822/553147
Hu, H. Y. (2008). On textual cohesion in Chinese students’ English writing. Journal of Zhejiang Normal University (Social Science), 33(3), 113–116.
Hyland, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173–192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
Kaplan, R. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-1770.1966.tb00804.x
Koch, B. J. (1983). Presentation as proof: The language of Arabic rhetoric. Anthropological Linguistics, 25(1), 47–60.
Kubota, R., & Lehner, A. (2004). Toward critical contrastive rhetoric. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.08.002
Matsuda, P. K. (2001). Voice in Japanese written discourse: Implications for second language writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(1-2), 35–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00036-9
Ostler, S. E. (1987). English in parallels: A comparison of English and Arabic prose. In U. Connor & R. B. Kaplan (Eds.), Writing across languages: Analysis of L2 text (pp. 169–185). Addison-Wesley.
Patpong, P. (2013). Thematic progression of Thai Song Dam folktales. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society (JSEALS), 9, 189–215.
Potter, L. (2016). Ideological representations and Theme-Rheme analysis in English and Arabic news reports: A systemic functional approach. Functional Linguistics, 3(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40554-016-0028-y
Purves, A. C. (1988). Introduction. In A. C. Purves (Ed.), Writing across languages and cultures: Issues in contrastive rhetoric (pp. 160–176). Sage.
Sa’adeddin, M. A. (1989). Text development and Arabic-English negative interference. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 36–51.
Thompson, G. (2014). Introducing functional grammar (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Wan Fakhruddin, W. F. W., Hassan, H., Saidalvi, A., & Zaid, Y. H. (2023). Thematic progression patterns and meaning portrayal in forest inspection report. In Embracing Change: Emancipating the Landscape of Research in Linguistic, Language and Literature (Vol 7 European Proceedings of Educational Sciences, pp. 597-610). European Publisher. https://doi.org/10.15405/epes.23097.54
Wang, B. (2021). Thematic progression in multimodal physics texts. Linguistics and Education, 64, 100946. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2021.100946
Wei, J. (2016). Thematic choice in Chinese college students' English essays. English for Specific Purposes, 41, 50–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2015.09.003
