Sexual Harassment at Workplace: A Pragmatic Study

Authors

  • Mariam D. Saffah College of Education for Human Sciences
  • Fareed H. Al-Hindawi Islamic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1604.02

Keywords:

harassment, sexual, pragmatics, strategies, workplace

Abstract

Sexual harassment is a phenomenon that has been prevailing in everyday workplace. It refers to undesirable sex-oriented conduct usually carried out by a powerful male employer towards a female employee. Sexual harassment may result in humiliation, degradation and loss of reputation on the part of the target. Despite the fact that sexual harassment is pervasive in workplace interactions, it has remained relatively linguistically, particularly pragmatically, unexplored. Therefore, the present study endeavours to investigate this phenomenon at workplace from a pragmatic point of view in selected medical TV shows as represented examples of the genre investigated. It is hypothesized that harassers in medical TV shows employ some pragmatic strategies more than others to harass their victims and achieve their goals. Precisely, this study attempts to answer the following questions: What are the types, forms and elements of sexual harassment employed in the data under scrutiny? What are the pragmatic aspects of workplace sexual harassment? And what are the pragmatic strategies used to manifest the pragmatic aspects of workplace sexual harassment? The findings of the study have demonstrated that different pragmatic aspects are utilized by harassers in the TV shows analyzed. These comprise impoliteness strategies and speech acts. However, statistical analysis has revealed that impoliteness strategies occur with a higher frequency than speech act strategies.

Author Biographies

Mariam D. Saffah, College of Education for Human Sciences

Department of English

Fareed H. Al-Hindawi, Islamic University

Department of English

References

Berdahl, J. L., & Raver, J. L. (2011). Sexual Harassment. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, Vol. 3. Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization (pp. 641–669).

Boland, M. L. (2005). Sexual Harassment in the Workplace. Illinois: Sphinx Publishing.

Britz, E. (2007). The Perceptions of Employees Regarding Sexual Harassment in an Administrative Higher Educational Work [Unpublished M. A. Dissertation]. University of Johannesburg.

Brodsky, C. M. (1976). The Harassed Worker. Toronto: Lexington Books.

Chapman, S. (2011). Pragmatics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Clark, H. (2001). "Conversation: Linguistic Aspects". In International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (pp. 2744-2747). New York: Elsevier Science Ltd.

Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25, 349-367.

Culpeper, J. (2011). Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dynel, M. (2008). No Aggression, only Teasing: The Pragmatics of Teasing and Banter. Lodz Papers in Pragmatics, 4(2), 241-261.

Elshout, M., Nelissen, R. M. A., & Beest, Ilja V. (2016). Conceptualising Humiliation. Cognition and Emotion, 31(8), 1581-1594.

Guillen-Nieto, V. (2022). Language as Evidence in Workplace Harassment. Corela, 36, 1-19.

Grey's Anatomy: Season 2, Episode 6 script. (n.d.). https://subslikescript.com/series/Greys_Anatomy-413573/season-2/episode-6-Into_You_Like_a_Train

Howard, L. (2007). The Sexual Harassment Handbook. New York: Career Press.

Jucker, A. H., & Taavitsainen, I. (2000). Diachronic Speech Act Analysis: Insults from Flyting to Flaming. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 1(1), 67-95.

Keashly, L., & Jagatic, K. (2011). North American Perspective on Hostile Behaviors and Bullying at Work. In S. Einarsen, H. Hoel, D. Zapf, & C. Cooper (Eds.), Bullying and Harassment in the Workplace. London: Taylor and Francis Group.

Leyman, H. (1990). Mobbing and Psychological Terror at Workplace. Violence and Victims, 5, 119-126.

Leask, P. (2013). Losing Trust in the World: Humiliation and its Consequences. Psychodynamic Practice, 19(2), 129-142.

Lee, Sungbom. (2012). A Pragmatic Analysis of Deformation and Slanderous Remarks. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 37(2), 401-416.

Ljung, M. (2011). Swearing: Across-Cultural Linguistic Study. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Mackinnon, Catharine A. (1979). Sexual Harassment of Working Women: A Case of Sexual Discrimination. London: Yale University Press.

Monks, C. P., & Coyne, L. (2011). Bullying in Different Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Neuman, J., & Baron, R. (1998). Workplace Violence and Workplace Aggression: Evidence Concerning Specific Forms, Potential Cases, and Preferred Targets. Journal of Management, 24(3), 391-419.

Ramedani, S., Bozorghadad, S., & Olympia, R. (2020). Depiction of Sexual Harassment in Medical Television Shows. Cureus, 12(12), 1-6.

Rhimes, Shonda. (2004). Grey’s Anatomy pilot revisions [PDF]. https://script-pdf.s3.amazonaws.com/greys-anatomy-pilot-1-tv-script-pdf.pdf

Searle, J. (1976). A Classification of Illocutionary Acts. Language in Society, 5(1), 1-23.

Season 4 Scene Summaries: The Cordano Love Lounge. (n.d.). https://cordayandromano.tripod.com/id24.html

Tistory Blog. (n.d.). http://cfs4.tistory.com/upload_control/download.blog

Weinbergs, J., & Nielsen, L. (2017). What is Sexual Harassment? An Empirical Study of Perceptions of Ordinary People and Judges. Saint Louis University Public Law Review, 36(1), 38-58.

Downloads

Published

2026-04-01

Issue

Section

Articles