Oriental Characters on the English Stage: A Product of Misunderstanding?

Authors

  • Mohammed A. Rawashdeh Yarmouk University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1602.28

Keywords:

drama, Muslims, deity, polytheists, misunderstanding

Abstract

Between the Renaissance and the twentieth century, Western dramatists wrote a body of plays about life in the Orient, to be performed for European audiences. These Oriental plays were particularly popular in England. Playwrights drew their information mainly from existing sources. These writers habitually portrayed Muslim characters in ways that not only seriously failed to reflect their actual beliefs, but outright contradicted the fundamental tenets of the Islamic faith. This paper explores the portrayal of Mohammed as a deity and Muslims as polytheists. It attempts to examine whether these misrepresentations of Muslims can be attributed to either grievous misunderstandings or malicious intentions. Although Islamic doctrine clearly emphasizes the nature of Mohammed as a normal human being, we find Muslim characters in the Western dramas elevate him to divine status, attributing to him the capabilities of a god or deity. We likewise find his followers acknowledging the existence of other gods, including those of the Greeks and the Romans, swearing by them and invoking them, despite the fact that those who adhere to the teachings of Mohammed are strict believers in the absolute oneness of God. Dramatists presented to the English audience Muslim characters who display an unnatural mix of Islamic, Christian, and pagan traditions. The result is a confused portrayal that distorts the Islamic identity of those characters. It seems evident that this misrepresentation of the Muslim character as being foreign, extremist, and uncivilized, whether intentionally or through misunderstanding, contributed to the attitudes held by Europeans toward Islam.

Author Biography

Mohammed A. Rawashdeh, Yarmouk University

Department of English Language and Literature

References

Bay, Sedat. (2025). The Tragical Reign of Selimus as a Hybrid Tragedy. Atlas Journal, 1(56), 69-82. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15232213. Accessed May 5th 2025.

Birchwood, Mathew. (2020). ‘Puritan Mahumetans’: Reading Anglo-Muslim Contexts in Aphra Behn’s Abdelazer and The False Count. Women’s Writing, 27(3), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09699082.2020.1748809. Accessed May 5th 2025.

Cowley, Hannah. (1779). A Day in Turkey. In Frederick M. Link (Ed.), The Plays of Hannah Cowley (Vol. 2). New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.

Davenant, William. (1964). The Siege of Rhodes. In The Dramatic Works of Sir William Davenant (Vol. 3). New York: Russell & Russell Inc.

Del Balzo, Angelina. (2015). The Sultan’s Tears in Zara, an Oriental Tragedy. SEL Studies in English Literature 1500–1900, 55(3), 501-521. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24511189. Accessed April 20th 2025.

Greene, Robert. (1898). The Tragical Reign of Selimus (Alexander B. Grosart, Ed.). London: J. M. Dent & Co., Aldine House.

Hammerbeck, David. (2003). Voltaire’s Mahomet, the Persistence of Cultural Memory and Pre-Modern Orientalism. Agora: An Online Graduate Journal, 2(2), 1-14. https//www.arts.ualberta.ca/agro. Accessed May 5th 2025.

Haywood, Eliza. (1721). The Fair Captive: A Tragedy. London: Printed for T. Jauncy and H. Cole.

Hizam, Akram N., & Fangyun Guo. (2023). The Greek Depiction of Muslims in Tamburlaine the Great: Orientalist Study. International Journal of English and Literature, 14(1), 5–18. DOI:10.5897/IJEL2023.1566. Accessed May 5th 2025.

Hodson, William. (1779). Zoraida: A Tragedy. London: Printed by W. Richardson, in the Strand, for G. Kearsly.

Hughes, John. (1720). The Siege of Damascus, A Tragedy. London: Printed for Longman.

Imran, M., Nazakat, & Khan, A. (2019). Representation of the Orient: A Postcolonial Perspective on Robert Greene’s Selimus. Global Political Review, 4(4), 114-123. DOI:10.31703/gpr.2019(IV-IV).13.

Jackson, Honor. (2022). Gender and Foreignness in William Davenant’s The Siege of Rhodes Parts One and Two (1656 –1663). Cahiers Ȇlisabȇthains: A Journal of English Renaissance Studies, 109(1), 75-84. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/01847678221130996.

Lechner, Doris. (2016). ‘And am I thus Rewarded?’ The Rejected Hero and the Raped Heroine in Mary Pix’s Ibrahim. De Gruyter, 64(4), 367-383. https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/zaa-2016-003i5/pdf. Accessed May 5th 2025.

Leichman, Jeffery M. (2018). The Mahomet Paradox: The Necessity of an Impossible Text. Studies in Eighteenth-Century Culture, 47. https://doi.org/10.1353/sec.2018.0023. Accessed May 5th 2025.

Maciulewicz, Joanna et al. (2024). Transplanting Arabic History into English Drama; The Trans Textuality of John Hughes’s The Siege of Damascus (1720). In Anna Paluchowska-Messin et al. (Eds.), Eighteenth-Century Transplantations: New Literary Lives, Forms and Contexts (Chapter 4). DOI:10.4324/9781003362197-7. Accessed May 6th 2025.

Manley, Mary de la Riviere. (1706). Almyna: or, The Arabian Vow. London: Printed for R. Basset and E. Curll. https://archive.org/details/almynaorarabianv00manl/page/n5/mode/2up. Accessed May 5th 2025.

Markley, Robert. (2008). Introduction: Rethinking Restoration and Eighteenth-Century Drama. Comparative Drama, 42(1), 1-6. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/compdr/vol42/iss1/1/. Accessed May 6th 2025.

Marlowe, Christopher. (1976). Tamburlaine the Great, Part II. In Russell A. Fraser & Norman Rabkin (Eds.), Drama of the Renaissance I: The Tudor Period. New York: MacMillan Publishing Co., Inc.

Marsden, Jane I. (1999). Mary Pix’s Ibrahim: The Woman Writers a Commercial Playwright. Studies in the Literary Imagination, 3(2), 33-44. https://go.gale.com/ps/i.do?id=GALE%7CA64523906&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=00393819&p=AONE&sw=w&userGroupName=yu_jo&aty=ip. Accessed May 5th 2025.

Moore, John Robert. (1968). Hughes’s Source for ‘The Siege of Damascus’. Huntington Library Quarterly, 21(4), 362-366. https://doi.org/stable/3816268. Accessed April 20th 2025.

Nawawy, Imam. (1274). The Book of the Prohibited Actions. In Riyad as-Salihin. https://sunnah.com. Accessed June 18, 2025.

Park, Judy H. (2016). The Limits of Empire in Davenant’s The Siege of Rhodes. Mediterranean Studies, 24(1), 47-76. https://muse.jhu.edu/pub/2/article/616680/pdf. Accessed May 20th 2025.

Pix, Mary. (1696). Ibrahim, The Thirteenth Emperour of the Turks. London: printed for John Harding. https://digitalcollections.rice.edu/documents/detail/57700. Accessed April 20th 2025.

Ruthven, Malise. (2003). Preface: Voltaire and Islam Voltaire’s Fanaticism, or Mahomet the Prophet. https://litwinbooks.com/voltaires-fanaticism-or-mahomet-the-prophet-preface/ Accessed July 2nd, 2025.

Settle, Elkanah. (1682). The Heir of Morocco with the Death of Gayland. London: Printed for William Cademan. https://quod.lib.umich.edu/e/eebo/A59315.0001.001/1:5.1?rgn=div2. Accessed May 6th 2025.

Settle, Elkanah. (1676). Ibrahim, The Illustrious Bassa. London: Printed by Thomas Milbourn for W. Cademan.

Southerne, Thomas. (1988). The Loyal Brother. In Robert Jordan & Harold Love (Eds.), The Works of Thomas Southerne. Oxford: Clarendon Press. (Original work published 1682)

The Holy Bible: King James Version. (1987). Thomas Nelson.

The Holy Qur’an: English Translation of the Meanings and Commentary. (1992). Al-Madina Al-Munawareh: King Fahd Complex for printing the Holy Qur’an.

Thurn, David H. (1989). Sights of Power in Tamburlaine. English Literary Renaissance, 19(1), 3-21. https://www.jstor.org/stable/43447264. Accessed April 20th 2025.

Uygur, Ipek. (2014). Tamburlaine the Great: ‘The Scourge and Wrath of God’. Procedia: Social and Behavioral Sciences, 158, 155-159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.061. Accessed April 20th 2025.

Voltaire. (1964). Mahomet The Prophet or Fanaticism (Robert L Meyers, Trans.). In Hans Kohn & Sidney Hook (Eds.), Milestones of Thought in the History of Ideas. New York: Frederick Ungar Publishing Co. Inc. (Original work published 1741)

Downloads

Published

2026-02-01

Issue

Section

Articles