Linguo-Conceptual and Linguocultural Analysis of the Concept “Memory”: Semantic Typology of Kazakh-Russian-English Phraseology

Authors

  • Altyn Bakytzhanova Institute of Legislation and Legal Information of the Republic of Kazakhstan under the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Kazakhstan
  • Saltanat B. Bekmukhambetova West Kazakhstan University named after M.Utemisov
  • Elmira K. Utemissova West Kazakhstan University named after M.Utemisov
  • Syrym Zhanzhigitov L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University
  • Aigul Y. Alpysbayeva Al-Farabi Kazakh national University
  • Gulmira S. Omarbayeva Al-Farabi Kazakh national University
  • Svetlana S. Tatiyeva International Information Technology University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1512.36

Keywords:

memory, language, culture, phraseology, cross-cultural comparison

Abstract

The present study is devoted to the linguo-conceptual and linguo-cultural analysis of the phraseological representation of the concept memory based on the material of Kazakh, Russian, and English languages. The trilingual language policy and approach in Kazakhstan promotes proficiency in Kazakh as the state language, Russian as the language of interethnic communication, and English as the language of international integration. The object of analysis is phraseological units that form the phraseosemantic macrofield memory within the structure of the intellectual conceptual sphere of the aforementioned linguocultures. The research is based on a comprehensive methodological approach, which includes etymological, componential, structural-semantic, comparative methods, and modeling. The scientific novelty of the study lies in the development of a semantic typology of phraseological units representing the concept memory, as well as in the identification of its cognitive structure, which includes three microfields: processes of memory consolidation, forgetting, and reproduction of previously acquired information. In addition, an analysis of linguocultural connotations and evaluative components was carried out, reflecting cultural values, archetypes, and mental model’s characteristic of each of the examined language systems. The results obtained broaden the understanding of the ways memory is conceptualized as a cognitive and cultural phenomenon, contribute to the theoretical foundation of anthropocentric linguistics, and have practical applications in intercultural communication, translation studies, linguoculturology, and foreign language teaching.

Author Biographies

Saltanat B. Bekmukhambetova, West Kazakhstan University named after M.Utemisov

Training teachers of foreign languages and literature

Elmira K. Utemissova, West Kazakhstan University named after M.Utemisov

Training teachers of foreign languages and literature

Syrym Zhanzhigitov, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University

Department of Kazakh Linguistics

Aigul Y. Alpysbayeva, Al-Farabi Kazakh national University

Department of Foreign Philology and Translation Studies

Gulmira S. Omarbayeva, Al-Farabi Kazakh national University

Department of Foreign Philology and Translation Studies

Svetlana S. Tatiyeva, International Information Technology University

Department of Languages

References

Akbulut, F. (2023). Cross-cultural pragmatics and conceptual metaphor theory: The translation of idiomatic expressions. Söylem Filoloji Dergisi, (Çeviribilim Özel Sayısı), 594–606. https://doi.org/10.29110/soylemdergi.1184722

Al-Minawi, R. (2024). Analyzing the rhetoric of the Aqsa flood war (2023–2024): A study of Hamas' official discourse through conceptual metaphor theory and critical discourse analysis. International Journal of Linguistics Literature and Translation, 7(1), 191–198. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2024.7.1.17

Alisoy, H. (2024). Semantic classification of phraseological units. Acta Humanitatis et Linguarum, 1(2), 43–55. https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.01024064

Andersen, T., & Ortner, J. (2019). Introduction: Memories of joy. Memory Studies, 12(1), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698018811976

Ayto, J. (2010). Oxford dictionary of English idioms (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Budiman, A. (2019). War metaphors in political contestation prior to 2019 presidential election. https://doi.org/10.2991/iccd-19.2019.12

Bullo, S. (2017). Investigating intertextuality and interdiscursivity in evaluation: The case of conceptual blending. Language and Cognition, 9(4), 709–727. https://doi.org/10.1017/langcog.2017.5

Bull, A., & Hansen, H. (2016). On agonistic memory. Memory Studies, 9(4), 390–404. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698015615935

Ben-Aroia, B., & Ebbrecht-Hartmann, T. (2020). Memorials as discursive spheres: Holocaust and Second World War iconography in public commemoration of extremist-right violence. Memory Studies, 14(4), 797–818. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698020959800

Cambridge University Press. (1998). Cambridge international dictionary of idioms. Cambridge University Press.

Chang, K. (2022). Re-picturing the reception of the spirit with ritual experience: The role of baptism in 1 Corinthians 12:13. Biblical Theology Bulletin Journal of Bible and Culture, 52(3), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461079221108371

Đào, H. (2022). Conceptual “politics is war” metaphors in titles and sapo of Nhan Dan Online and The New York Times. Vietnam Academy of Social Sciences S VSSR, 210(4), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.56794/vssr.4(210).75-89

Gülüm, E. (2023). Folkloric memory: (Re)connecting the dots for broader perspectives. Memory Studies, 16(6), 1466–1483. https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980231204175

Gaál, G. (2023). The city as memory in contemporary Polish women's literature. Tudásmenedzsment, 24(4. különszám), 128–137. https://doi.org/10.15170/tm.2023.24.k4.10

Hadidi, Y., & Zare, F. (2020). Exploring the metaphors of loyalty, courage and friendship in Harry Potter novels and their Turkish translations. Khazar Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 23(4), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.5782/2223-2621.2020.23.4.5

Hoskins, A. (2016). Memory ecologies. Memory Studies, 9(3), 348–357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750698016645274

Hagedoorn, B. (2019). Cultural memory and screen culture. In Cultural Memory and Popular Culture (pp. 179–197). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19262-4_7

Hasanbievna, T., & Bizhoev, B. (2021). Reflection of national consciousness in the emotiology of Kabardino-Circassian language. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2021.11.203

Jesudas, R., & Mohammed, Z. (2024). Eloquent metaphors: Leveraging linguistic tools for leadership in Biden's inaugural political rhetoric. EJCEEL, 2(2), 19–33. https://doi.org/10.59324/ejceel.2024.2(2).02

Jamalpour, H., & Yaghoobi-Derabi, J. (2022). Cultural memory and neuro-critical reading of Ian McEwan's Atonement. Revista De Investigaciones Universidad Del Quindío, 34(S2), 436–442. https://doi.org/10.33975/riuq.vol34ns2.1142

Kenesbaev, I. K. (2007). Frazeologiyalyq sozdik [Phraseological Dictionary]. Almaty: Arys.

Kunin, A. V. (2006). Anglo-russkiy frazeologicheskiy slovar’ [English–Russian Phraseological Dictionary]. Moskva: Russkiy Yazyk-Media.

Kozhakhmetova, G., & Sagidolda, G. (2019). Yurt as a micro model of the universe in the context of "language: culture" (Linguistic and cultural analysis on the material of the Kazakh and Mongolian languages). Homeros, 2(2), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.33390/homeros.2.005

Kövecses, Z. (2018). Metaphor, cognition, culture. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190879228.003.0002

Kirik, V., Leshkevich, T., & Motozhanets, A. (2018). Memory culture as the main priority of the modern education process. https://doi.org/10.2991/icadce-18.2018.129

Liu, W., & Nie, X. (2023). Cultural heritage game design based on the collective memory reconstruction model. SHS Web of Conferences, 167, 02004. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202316702004

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

Lai, H. (2022). Metaphor in Hakka proverbs. Language and Linguistics 語言暨語言學, 549–576. https://doi.org/10.1075/lali.00020.lai

Mamasheva, O., Madmarova, G., Abytova, G., Berdibekova, B., Bolotakunova, G., Ormokeeva, R., & Abdullaeva, Z. (2021). Reflection of nations mentality in the Kyrgyz, Russian and English language phraseological units. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 11(1), 24–33. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2021.111002

Meshcheryakov, B. G. (2004). Pamyat’ cheloveka: Effekty i fenomeny [Human Memory: Effects and Phenomena]. Moskva: OOO «Voprosy psikhologii».

Popova, Z. D., & Sternin, I. A. (2007). Kognitivnaya lingvistika [Cognitive Linguistics]. Moskva: AST: Vostok-Zapad.

Putri, W., & McDermott, S. (2023). Bridging a transnational mother-daughter's relationship through a memoir. Enjourme (English Journal of Merdeka), 8(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.26905/enjourme.v8i1.10373

Pugach, Y. (2024). The verbalization of emotions in English phraseological units. Scientific Journal of National Pedagogical Dragomanov University. Series 9: Current Trends in Language Development, (27), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.31392/npu-nc.series9.2024.27.04

Quan, T., & Huynh, A. (2024). Modulation of moving conceptual metaphors in Vietnamese translation in economic discourse. VNU Journal of Foreign Studies, 40(1), 26–56. https://doi.org/10.63023/2525-2445/jfs.ulis.5208

Radbil, T., Akhmetzhanova, G., Zhumagulova, Z., Seralieva, A., & Seralieva, G. (2020). Dusha (“soul”) and telo (“body”) in the aspect of contrastive analysis of cultural concepts: Materials for the linguo-cultorological phraseological dictionary of Russian-Kazakh correlations. Nauchnyi Dialog, (3), 127–150. https://doi.org/10.24224/2227-1295-2020-3-127-150

Schliephake, C. (2016). Literary place and cultural memory. In The Literary and Cultural Reception of Charles Darwin in Europe (Vol. 2, pp. 569–589). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110314595-031

Sedykh, A., Buzinova, L., Akimova, E., Pashkovskaia, N., Skvortsov, K., Shcherbakov, A., & Beshinskaya, N. (2023). Phraseological picture of the world and communication: Take “carpe diem” as an example. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(5), 1159–1166. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1305.08

Savelyeva, M., Khomutnikova, E., & Borovykh, Y. (2019). Semantic classification of object phraseological units with zoonymic component in English. SHS Web of Conferences, 69, 00099. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20196900099

Sopova, I. (2020). Personal transformations of phraseological units in the discourse of politics. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2020.12.04.102

Stepanova, M. I. (2006). Frazeologicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Phraseological Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Sankt-Peterburg: Poligrafuslugi.

Teliya, V. N. (Ed.). (2006). Bol’shoy frazeologicheskiy slovar’ russkogo yazyka: Znachenie. Upotreblenie. Kulturologicheskiy kommentariy [The Big Phraseological Dictionary of the Russian Language: Meaning, Usage, Cultural Commentary]. Moskva: AST-Press Kniga.

Temple, C. (2021). Africana cultural memory in the Afroeuropean context. Journal of Black Studies, 52(4), 418–440. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021934721999296

Tien, T. (2022). Universality vs. cultural specificity of anger metaphors and metonymies in English and Vietnamese idioms. Russian Journal of Linguistics, 26(1), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.22363/2687-0088-24951

Yarancev, R. I. (2006). Russkaya frazeologiya: Slovar’-spravochnik (ok. 1500 frazeologizmov) [Russian Phraseology: Dictionary-Reference (approx. 1500 phraseological units)]. Moskva: Russkiy Yazyk-Media.

Zhang, X. (2021). Development and critiques of conceptual metaphor theory. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(11), 1487–1491. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1111.18

Downloads

Published

2025-12-01

Issue

Section

Articles