Clause Structure and Topicalization in Nias Language: A Typological Analysis

Authors

  • Ida Basaria Universitas Sumatera Utara
  • Dardanila Dardanila Universitas Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1512.17

Keywords:

clause structure, indigenous language, Nias language, syntactic typology, topicalization

Abstract

This study investigates the clause structure and topicalization strategies of Nias language (BN), an Austronesian language spoken in North Sumatra, Indonesia. Employing a qualitative descriptive approach, the research aims to portray and analyze syntactic and discourse phenomena in BN within their natural linguistic and cultural contexts. The data were collected through participant observation and naturalistic recording of spontaneous speech among native BN speakers, ensuring authenticity and contextual richness. The recordings were transcribed, translated, and analyzed to identify basic and derived clause patterns and the syntactic mechanisms used to mark topicality. Special attention was given to preverbal positioning, pronominal resumption, and left-dislocation, which reflect BN’s alignment with topic-prominent languages. The findings reveal that BN, while maintaining a canonical SVO structure, frequently employs marked word orders and topic-fronting strategies to serve discourse functions. These strategies exhibit a disciplined syntactic patterning that supports flexible information structure. A typological-comparative analysis positions BN within the broader Austronesian language family, highlighting both shared features and distinctive innovations, such as possessive topicalization. The study contributes to theoretical models of clause architecture, typological profiling of Austronesian languages, and ongoing efforts in linguistic documentation and preservation of Indonesia’s indigenous languages.

Author Biographies

Ida Basaria, Universitas Sumatera Utara

Indonesian Language Study Program

Dardanila Dardanila, Universitas Sumatera Utara

Indonesian Language Study Program

References

Artawa, I K. (1998). Ergativity and Balinese syntax. Volume 42–44 of NUSA. Universitas Katolik Indonesia Atma Jaya.

Assaiqeli, A., Maniam, M., & Farrah, M. (2021). Inversion and word order in English: A functional perspective. Studies in English Language and Education, 8(2), 523-545. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v8i2.20217

Bondarenko, A. (2021). Verbless and zero-predicate sentences: An English and Russian contrastive corpus study [Ph.D. thesis]. Université Paris Cité. Retrieved March 11, 2025, from https://theses.hal.science/tel-03706573v1

Brown, L. (2001). A grammar of Nias Selatan [Ph.D. thesis]. University of Sydney. Retrieved April 17, 2025, from https://ses.library.usyd.edu.au/handle/2123/12669

Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads—A crosslinguistic perspective. Oxford University Press.

Comrie, B. (1989). Language universals and linguistic typology: Syntax and morphology (2nd ed.). The University of Chicago Press.

Cruschina, S. (2021). Topicalization in the Romance languages. In M. Aronoff (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of linguistics (pp. 1-23). Oxford University Press.

Crysmann, B. (2009). Deriving superficial ergativity in Nias. In S. Müller (Ed.), Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany (pp. 68–88). CSLI Publications. https://doi.org/10.21248/hpsg.2009.4

Cumming, S. (1991). Functional change: The case of Malay constituent order. Mouton de Gruyter.

Dryer, M. S. (2013). On the six-way word order typology, again. Studies in Language, 37(2), 267-301. https://doi.org/10.1075/sl.37.2.02dry

Dryer, M. S., & Haspelmath, M. (Eds.). (2013). The world atlas of language structures online. Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13950591

Engelhardt, P. E., Filipović, L., & Hawkins, J. A. (2023). Prediction in SVO and SOV languages: Processing and typological considerations. Linguistics, 62(2), 349-383. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling-2022-0055

Ersheidat, G., & Tahir, H. (2020). Genetic relationship among languages: An overview. International Journal of Language Education and Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.15282/ijleal.v10.3320

Greenberg, J. H. (1963). Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of language (pp. 73-113). MIT Press.

Gulo, M. B., Ambarita, E., & Simamora, N. J. (2023). Comparative forms of adjectives in Nias language: Astudyon Johane’s book in the Bible. Metholangue, 8(2), 23-34. Retrieved February 8, 2025, from https://ejurnal.methodist.ac.id/index.php/metholangue/article/view/2461/1735

Gulö, I. (2014). Unique characteristics of Nias language. International Journal of English and Education, 3(3), 26-32. Retrieved February 6, 2025, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/297289332

Gundel, J. K. (1988). The role of topic and comment in linguistic theory: Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics. Garland Publishing.

Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.

Hawkins, J. A. (2004). Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford University Press.

Himmelmann, N. P. (2005). The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar: Typological characteristics. In A. Adelaar & N. P. Himmelmann (Eds.), The Austronesian languages of Asia and Madagascar (pp. 110-181). Routledge.

Himmelmann, N. P. (1998). Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics, 36(1), 161-196. https://doi.org/10.1515/ling.1998.36.1.161

Hulu, F., Mbete, A. M., & Umiyati, M. (2023). Syntax category of existence ecolexicon ke-afo-an in Central Nias language. ASSEHR, 734, 322–336, https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-014-5_29

Jufrizal. (2007). Tipologi gramatikal bahasa Minangkabau: Tataran morfosintaksis [Grammatical typology of Minangkabau language: Morphosyntactic level]. UNP Press.

Kashyap, A. K. (2019). Language typology. In G. Thompson, W. L. Bowcher, L. Fontaine, & D. Schönthal (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of systemic functional linguistics (pp. 766-791). Cambridge University Press.

Kroeger, P. (1993). Phrase structure and grammatical relations in Tagalog. CSLI Publications.

Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information structure and sentence form: Topic, focus, and the mental representations of discourse referents. Cambridge University Press.

Li, C. N., & Thompson, S. A. (1976). Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In C. N. Li (Ed.), Subject and topic (pp. 457-489). Academic Press.

Mallinson, G., & Blake, B. J. (1981). Language typology: Cross-linguistic studies in syntax. North-Holland Publishing Company.

Masia, V. (2024). Irish autonomous verbs in a semantic-pragmatic interface: Some reflections on information structure-driven valency reduction. Linguistik Online, 127(3), 83-106. https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.127.11089

Nazara, W. (2019). A note on the form and use of the language of Nias. Teknosastik, 17(1), 15-22. https://doi.org/10.33365/ts.v17i1.186

Nazara, W., Sudipa, I N., Artawa, K., & Satyawati, M. S. (2019). Causative constructions in the language of Nias. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(2), 208-216. https://doi.org/10.29332/ijssh.v3n2.316

Polili, A. W., Sinar, T. S., Widayati, D., & Adisahputra, A. A. (2018). The status of Nias language. Journal of Arts & Humanities, 7(1), 8-22. https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v7i1.1123

Rizzi, L. (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In L. Haegeman (Ed.), Elements of grammar: A handbook of generative syntax (pp. 281-337). Springer.

Swain, J., & King, B. (2022). Using informal conversations in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221085056

Tarigan, B., Sofyan, R., Zein, T. T., & Rosa, R. N. (2022). Cultural values associated with the use of ecolexicon “bamboo” in Karonese proverbs. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(10), 2106-2116. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1210.18

Telaumbanua, T. A. E., Nyoman Kardana, I., & Wayan Kasni, N. (2022). Grammatical alliance of South Nias dialect. KnE Social Sciences, 7(10), 204–214. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i10.11289

Telaumbanua, K., & Harefa, A. (2023). Prefixation in Nias language, 5(4), 11246-11250. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v5i4.2060

Widayati, D. (2020). Reconstruction of Nias, Devayan, and Sigulai languages. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 421, 408-427. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200323.048

Yohana, Y., & Mulyadi, M. (2024). Word order in the Nias language: A syntactic typological studies. Research and Innovation in Language Learning, 7(2), 1-9. Retrieved February 17, 2025, from https://ejournalugj.com/index.php/RILL/article/view/8965/4407

Zaim, M. (2014). Metode penelitian bahasa: Pendekatan structural [Language research methods: Structural approach]. FBS UNP Press.

Zimmermann, M., & Onea, E. (2011). Focus marking and focus interpretation. Lingua, 121(11), 1651–1670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2011.06.002

Downloads

Published

2025-12-01

Issue

Section

Articles