From Pestilence to Pollution: Eco-Criticism and the Transformation of the Four Horsemen in Good Omens
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1511.19Keywords:
eco-mythology, pollution, Apocalypse, environmental anxiety, Good OmensAbstract
Terry Pratchett and Neil Gaiman’s (1990) Good Omens offers an apocalyptic rewrite of mythology, making it clear that Pestilence has been overthrown and replaced with Pollution as one of the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse. This replacement reflects contemporary shifts of the cultural spotlight from the fear of infectious disease, which peaked in the mid-20th century, to the slow, gradual, and pernicious environmental damage caused by human agency. This shift continues through the current concerns of ecological collapse and climate change. Conventional wisdom suggests that in the Book of Revelation, Pestilence represents disease and decay. However, in Good Omens, Pollution symbolizes humanity’s most pressing existential threat: ecological devastation. Unlike apocalyptic works like McCarthy’s The Road (2006) and Mad Max, which depict a braver, more violent apocalypse, Good Omens critiques environmental destruction through humor and satire. Pollution is characterized as a passive yet powerful protagonist, representing modernity’s acceptance of ecological violence, spoofing obscene consumerism, and highlighting the destructiveness of modern societal habits. Through the lens of eco-criticism, this paper discusses how Good Omens interrogates current ecological worries and contributes to the conversation around climate justice. This approach ultimately leads to an insightful exploration of how Pestilence’s reframing as Pollution challenges the tropes of the apocalyptic genre, engaging with broader ecocritical and cultural discussions about the role literature can play in shifting perspectives on the ecological crises faced today.
References
Arnow, D. (2000). The changing role of myth in modern literature. Harvard University Press.
Bong, J. H. (Director). (2013). Snowpiercer [Film]. CJ Entertainment.
Buell, L. (2005). The future of environmental criticism: Environmental crisis and literary imagination. Blackwell Publishing.
Clark, T. (2019). The value of ecocriticism. Cambridge University Press.
Foster, R. (1998). Myth and culture: A study of the role of myth in the modern age. Oxford University Press.
Gaiman, N., & Pratchett, T. (1990). Good Omens: The nice and accurate prophecies of Agnes Nutter, witch. Workman Publishing.
Garrard, G. (2012). Ecocriticism (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Ghosh, A. (2016). The great derangement: Climate change and the unthinkable. University of Chicago Press.
Glotfelty, C. (1996). Literature and ecology: An eco-critical perspective. Springer.
Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press.
Jackson, M. H. (2012). Apocalyptic literature in the 21st century: Environmentalism, myth, and culture. Columbia University Press.
McCarthy, C. (2006). The road. Alfred A. Knopf.
Nixon, R. (2011). Slow violence and the environmentalism of people with low incomes. Harvard University Press.
Riddle, J. (2015). The four horsemen: Mythology and its modern reinterpretations. Routledge.
Rueckert, W. (1996). Literature and ecology: An eco-critical perspective. Springer.
The Holy Bible, New International Version. (2011). Zondervan (Original work published 1978).
Williams, R. (2003). Culture and society. Columbia University Press.
Miller, G. (Director). (1979). Mad Max [Film]. Kennedy Miller Productions.
Miller, G. (Director). (2015). Mad Max: Fury Road [Film]. Village Roadshow Picture.
