Metadiscourse Markers and Persuasion in Saudi Influencers' Snapchat Advertising Discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1511.08Keywords:
persuasion, advertising discourse, metadiscourse markers, Saudi Snapchat influencers, advertisementsAbstract
This qualitative study investigated persuasion in advertising discourse posted on Snapchat by Saudi influencers through the lens of metadiscourse markers. The data for this study was gathered from recordings of advertised snaps posted by 20 Snapchat influencers (10 males and 10 females). The discourses were analysed using Hyland's (2005a, 2005b) metadiscourse markers. The findings indicated that stance markers were the most frequently employed (54.7%), with attitude markers (20.5%) being the most common, followed by self-mention (18.7%), boosters (12.2%), and hedges (3.3%). Engagement markers constituted 45.3% of the findings, with hearer mentions (22.5%) being the most prevalent, followed by directives (16.7%), questions (4.2%), personal asides (1.6%), and appeals to shared knowledge (0.3%). The study concluded by examining the implications for marketing that could improve persuasive advertising discourse from a linguistic standpoint, in addition to providing suggestions for future research endeavors.
References
Alkhodari, F. T., & Habil, H. (2021). Metadiscourse Markers in Dr. Zakir Naik's Persuasive Discourse. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 21(4), 342- 363. http://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2021-2104-18
Al-Subhi, A. S. (2022). Metadiscourse in online advertising: Exploring linguistic and visual metadiscourse in social media advertisements. Journal of Pragmatics, 187, 24-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.10.027
Banjar, H. (2023). Saudi Female Social Media Influencers and Their Advertising Discourses: A Critical Discourse Analysis Perspective (Publication No. 30423214) [Doctoral dissertation, Arizona State University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Cotter, C. (2015). Discourse and media. In D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton, & D. Schiffrin (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (2nd ed., pp. 795-821). Wiley Blackwell.
Cook, G. (2001). The discourse of advertising. Psychology Press.
Dafouz-Milne, E. (2008). The pragmatic role of textual and interpersonal metadiscourse markers in the construction and attainment of persuasion: A cross-linguistic study of newspaper discourse. Journal of pragmatics, 40(1), 95-113.
Danesi, M. (2015). Advertising discourse. In P. J. Kalb (Ed.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 1–10). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi137
Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford University Press.
Elzouka, M. (2024). Stance and engagement in Egypt’s argument before the ICJ on Israeli practices in Palestinian territories: A linguistic analysis of interactional metadiscourse markers. Transcultural Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 5(4), 8-27. https://dx.doi.org/10.21608/tjhss.2024.316915.1267
Félix-Brasdefer, J. C. (2007). Natural speech vs. elicited data: A comparison of natural and role play requests in Mexican Spanish. Spanish in Context, 4(2), 159-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/sic.4.2.03fel
Gustafsson, M. (2018). Metadiscourse in advertising: Persuasion in online advertisements of makeup brands. [Unpublished Bachelor’s thesis, Linnaeus University]. DiVA. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-71585
Hyland, K. (2005a). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. Continuum, London.
Hyland, K. (2005b). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse studies, 7(2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
Hyland, K. (2017). Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of pragmatics, 113, 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007
Hyland, K., Wang, W., & Jiang, F. K. (2022). Metadiscourse across languages and genres: An overview. Lingua, 265, 103205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103205
Hyland, K., & Zou, H. J. (2021). “I believe the findings are fascinating”: Stance in three-minute theses. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 50, 100973. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100973
Hyland, K., & Zou, H. (2022). Pithy persuasion: Engagement in 3 minute thesis presentations. Applied Linguistics, 43(1), 21-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103205
Jucker, A. (2018). Data in pragmatic research. In A. Jucker, K. Schneider, & W. Bublitz (Eds.), Methods in Pragmatics (pp. 3-36). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110424928-001
Kashiha, H. (2022). On persuasive strategies: Metadiscourse in Barak Obama’s political speeches. Discourse and Interaction, 15(1), 77-100. https://doi.org/10.5817/DI2022-1-77
Kitis, E. (1997). Ads —part of our lives: Linguistic awareness of powerful advertising. Word & Image, 13(3), 304–313. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02666286.1997.10434291
Lai, X. (2023). A study of interactional metadiscourse and its persuasive function in advertising discourse. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 6(4), 79-84. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2023.6.4.11
Liu, Q., & Cheng, W. (2025). “I'm telling you”: The use of interactional metadiscourse in Chinese live streaming commerce. Journal of Pragmatics, 237, 14-29.
Liyanage, D. (2020). The Impact of the Advertising Discourse on Consumer Persuasion. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 10(12), 710-724. http://dx.doi.org/10.29322/IJSRP.10.12.2020.p10885
MacRury, I. (2008). Advertising. Routledge.
Marie, S., & Zibin, A. (2020). The use of persuasive speech acts by female Arab fashion influencers. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences, 47(4), 366-380.
Perrin, D. (2013). Investigating language and the media: The case of newswriting. AILA review, 26(1), 57-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/aila.26.05per
Pezzuti, T., Leonhardt, J. M., & Warren, C. (2021). Certainty in language increases consumer engagement on social media. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 53(1), 32-46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2020.06.005
Prudencio, A. B., Sherwin, C. C., Barcelona, J. A., Niduaza, B. R. Y. A. N., & Tongawan, P. F. C. (2023). Stylistic and discourse analysis of the language of social media influencers. Iconic Research and Engineering Journals, 7(1), 322-325.
Sánchez Macarro, A. (Ed.). (2002). Windows on the World: Media Discourse in English. University of Valencia Press.
Sandelowski, M. (1995). Sample size in qualitative research. Research in Nursing & Health, 18(2), 179–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770180211
Simões, E. (2023). Discourse(s) in advertising. In M. Handford & J. P. Gee (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd ed., pp. 525-538). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003035244
Tagg, C. & Spilioti, T. (2022). Research Ethics. In Vásquez, C. (Ed.), Research methods for digital discourse analysis (pp. 92-112). Bloomsbury Publishing.
Vahid, H., & Esmae’li, S. (2012). The power behind images: Advertisement discourse in focus. International journal of Linguistics, 4(4), 36-51. https://doi.org/10.5296/ijl.v4i4.2658
Xia, J. (2020). “Loving you”: Use of metadiscourse for relational acts in WeChat public account advertisements. Discourse, Context & Media, 37, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1515/text-2023-0175
Zou, H., & Hyland, K. (2022). Stance in academic blogs and three‐minute theses. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 32(2), 225-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12411
