Expressing National Ideology Through Archetypal Image “Wolf” in Kazakh Postmodern Literature: Take Balmolda’s Zhalkara as an Example

Authors

  • Aidarbek A. Akbulatov M. Utemisov West Kazakhstan University
  • Kamshat B. Zhumasheva M. Utemisov West Kazakhstan University
  • Zinulla Zh. Mutiyev M. Utemisov West Kazakhstan University
  • Karlygash K. Suleimenova Almaty Humanitarian and Economic University
  • Nazerke Y. Mubarak Kazakh National Women’s Teacher Training University
  • Gulzira Zh. Utegenova M. Auezov South Kazakhstan University
  • Aigul B. Nassimullina M. Utemisov West Kazakhstan University
  • Zhansaya G. Mussina M. Utemisov West Kazakhstan University
  • Rimma M. Kuzhentayeva M. Utemisov West Kazakhstan University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1511.05

Keywords:

modern Kazakh literature, postmodernism, archetype, archetypal image, wolf

Abstract

Modern Kazakh literature has played a crucial role in shaping and expressing the national ideology following Kazakhstan’s independence. Munaydar Balmolda is one of Kazakh postmodern prose writers with a high spirit of patriotism, who vividly reveals the theme of the irreconcilable struggle for the national idea, honor and courage, national spirit. The paper analyzes how Munaydar Balmolda creatively transforms advanced models of literature in accordance with his time using the particularly impressive archetypal image of the wolf cult to express the modern national ideology of independent Kazakhstan. This study is based on the qualitative analysis of folklore traditions and the mythological archetype of the wolf in Balmolda’s novel Zhalkara using a complex methodology combining narrative analysis, content analysis, artistic analysis, semiotic analysis and archetypal literary criticism. In the novel, the concept of the wolf functions as a cultural mental framework that can adapt and transform according to the author’s creative intentions. The wolf’s national symbolism is given a distinctive artistic expression, enriching the work with profound intellectual significance and enabling an artistic exploration of Kazakhstan’s national identity emphasizing such essential concepts as conscience, morality, liberty and the spirit of freedom. The examination of the evolution of 21st-century Kazakh prose, the current state of artistic text theory, and the challenges of meaningful philological analysis offers valuable insights for enhancing the theoretical education of aspiring literary scholars. The findings of this research can serve as supplementary material for elective courses such as the theory of artistic text, literary regional studies and contemporary Kazakh literary criticism.

References

Abdullina, A. B., Yildiz, N., & Sarsenbayeva, Zh. B. (2024). The issue of modern Kazakh postmodernism and neo-mythologism in the aspect of national knowledge (based on the stories of A. Kemelbayeva). Keruen Scientific Journal, 82(1), 158–168. https://doi.org/10.53871/2078-8134.2024.1-13

Aleshinskaya, E. (2020). Translation in forming musical discourse: A case study of English-language song lyrics in Russia. Research in Language, 18(4), 395–405. https://doi.org/10.18778/1731-7533.18.4.03

Altybayeva, S. M., & Sagyndykov, E. S. (2019). Mythical and folklore installations in the structure of the artistic text. Philological Aspect, 51(7), 153–164.

Ananyeva, S. (2021). Postmodern vision of the world in modern literature. Keruen, 71(2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.53871/2078-8134.2021.2-03

Balmolda, M. (2023). Novel Zhalkara. ShugylaPrint.

Baltabaeva, G. (2010). The artistic world of Kazakh prose of the independence period (stories and short stories). Kazakh National Pedagogical University named after Abay.

Bolshakova, A. Yu. (2003). Theory of the archetype at the turn of the 20th–21st centuries. Theoretical problems of literary criticism. Questions of Philology, 13(1), 25–31.

Burrows, D. J., Lapidus, F. R., & Shawcross, J. T. (1973). Myths and motifs in literature. The Free Press.

Campbell, J., & Moyers, B. (1988). The power of the myth. Doubleday.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research and design qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Dizayi, S., & Bağırlar, B. (2022). Mythmaking in modern literature: Harry Potter by J. K. Rolling. Journal of Advanced Research in Social Sciences, 5(3), 26–31. https://doi.org/10.33422/jarss.v5i3.761

Dobson, D. (2005). Archetypal literary theory in the postmodern era. Journal of Jungian Scholarly Studies, 1(1), 1–16.

Dubovaya, E. V. (2015). In the circle of bestiary images. Moscow State Pedagogical University.

Figlerowicz, M., & Mertehikian, L. (2023). An ever-expanding world literary genre: Defining magic realism on Wikipedia. Journal of Cultural Analytics, 8(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.22148/001c.73249

Gritsenko, E., & Aleshinskaya, E. (2015). Translanguaging in music: Conceptualizing modes of interaction in global contact zones. Voprosy Kognitivnoy Lingvistiki, 4, 73–80.

Haule, J. R. (2010). Jung in the 21st Century. Volume One: Evolution and archetype. Routledge.

Hillman, J. (2004). Archetypal psychology: A brief account. Spring Publications.

Izod, J. (2001). Myth, mind and the screen: Understanding the heroes of our time. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511489464

Jakipova, G. A., & Beissenova, Zh. S. (2021). A new intellectual tide in Kazakh literature. Cross-Cultural Studies: Education and Science, 6(1), 6–13.

Jung, C. (1959). Archetypes of the collective unconscious. Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Khazankovich, Yu. G. (2009). The image of the “wolf” in folklore and literature: To an archetype problem. Bulletin of the Saint Petersburg University of Economics and Finance, 2, 186–188.

Kenbayeva, A. Z., Bekmasheva, A. N., Umarova, G. S., Shakirova, K. M., & Tuimebekova, A. A. (2022). Functioning of toponymic lexis in Turkic epic literature. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(3), 45–54. http://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.803004

Markov, V. A. (1990). Literature and myth: The issue of archetypes (to the formulation of the question). In M. Chudakova (Ed.), Tynyanov collection. The Fourth Tynyanov Readings (pp. 130–138). Zinatne.

Pangereyev, A. S., Umatova, Z. M., Azamatova, A. K., Ibrayeva, Z. K., Karagoishiyeva, D. A., Umarova, G. S., & Kenbayeva, A. Z. (2023). Ethnocultural originality of color toponyms in Turkic folklore. Eurasian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 9(3), 216–225. http://doi.org/10.32601/ejal.903019

Pearson, C. S. (1998). The hero within: Six archetypes we live by. Harper Collins.

Rajabi, A., Azizi, M., & Akrabi, M. (2020). Magical realism: The magic of realism. Rupkatha Journal on Interdisciplinary Studies in Humanities, 12(1), 1–13. http://doi.org/10.21659/rupkatha.v12n2.18

Robertson, R. (1995). Glocalization: Time-space and homogeneity-heterogeneity. In Featherstone, M., Lash, S., & Robertson, R. (Eds.), Global modernities (pp. 25–44). Sage Publications.

Roudometof, V. (2015). The glocal and global studies. Globalizations, 12(5), 774–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2015.1016293

Sarbasov, B. S. (2016). The image of wolf in Kazakh folklore. Eurasian Journal of Philology: Science and Education, 160(2), 182–186.

Serikova, A., Rysaldy, K., & Geybullayeva, R. (2024). Futurality as a linguosynergetic category in postmodern discourse. Bakhtiniana, São Paulo, 19(2), e63927e. http://doi.org/10.1590/2176-4573e63927

Shanbai, T. (2009). The concept of culture (within the framework of Shakarim’s work). Raritet.

Sharyafetdinov, R. Kh. (2024). Mythopoetic images of the animal world as a reflection of the worldview of the Turkic peoples in modern Tatar literature. Nauka i shkola [Science and School], 3, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.31862/1819-463X-2024-3-18-28

Siskind, M. (2012). Magical realism. In Quayson, A. (Ed.), The Cambridge history of postcolonial literature (pp. 833–868). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/chol9781107007031.007

Sultangaliyeva, R. B., Sagidulliyeva, S. S., Mutiyev, Z. Z., Sagynadin, G. S., Akbulatov, A. A., Askarova, G. S., & Zhumasheva, K. B. (2024). Integration of world literary traditions and innovative artistic searches in contemporary Kazakh prose. Forum for Linguistic Studies, 6(6), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30564/fls.v6i6.7098

Sultangalieva, О. K., & Yerdembekov, B. A. (2023). National and ethnographic features of Kazakh poetry in the era of independence. Bulletin of L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University. PHILOLOGY Series, 142(1), 154–162. https://doi.org/10.32523/2616-678X-2023-142-1-154-162

Tanzharykova, A. V. (2010). Ethnographic and folklore motifs in Kazakh prose. Kazakh National Pedagogical University named after Abay.

Terekhova, T. A., & Malakhayeva, S. K. (2015). Narrative analysis as an understanding method. Humanities Vector, 41(1), 143–152.

Vunanburzhe, J. J. (2000). Principles of mythopoetic imagination. In Sokolov, B. G. (Ed.), Metaphysical studies (pp. 43–48). St. Petersburg University Publishing House.

Warnes, C., & Sasser, K. A. (2020). Introduction. In Warnes, C. & Sasser, K. A. (Eds.), Magical realism and literature (pp. 1–10). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108551601.001

White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22–45.

Zharylgapov, Zh., Syzdykova, B., Kaiyrbekova, A., Babashov, A., & Shakirova, K. (2023). Myth and mythological discourse in literary studies. Bakhtiniana. Revista de Estudos do Discurso, 18(4), e63680e. https://doi.org/10.1590/2176-4573e63680

Downloads

Published

2025-11-03

Issue

Section

Articles