Discursive Strategies Used in Trump’s Speech: Rally in Perry, GA, United States on September 25, 2021
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1506.09Keywords:
Critical Discourse Analysis, polarisation, Norm expressions, disclaimer, lexicalisationAbstract
This study is a Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) with special reference to one of Trump’s speeches called ‘Perry, GA, United States on September 25, 2021’. The study investigates Trump’s ideology, attitude and perspectives using Van Dijk’s socio-cognitive approach (2006). It aims to show how Trump justifies his ideas. The paper claims that there is an important deliberation of political discourse in replicating and influencing the community. Analysing the speeches linguistically shows how Trump conveys or expresses his ideologies. The paper adopted van Dijk’s’ model to examine the linguistic devices employed by Trump. Hence, the study found that discursive devices are present in Trump’s speech. Based on data analysis, the study finds that Trump uses 15 discursive devices: polarisation (Us-them categorisation) (356), Norm expressions (68), Disclaimer (52), Repetition (38), Lexicalisation (29), Metaphor (19), Simile (13), Negative labelling (12), Exaggeration (7), Self-glorification (4), Comparison (3), Number game (3), Implication (2), Victimisation (1) and Actor description (1).
References
Althusser, L. (1971). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses (Notes towards an investigation). In Lenin and philosophy and other essays, ed. L. Althusser, 127–186. New York: Monthly Review Press.
Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N. (1993). Critical discourse analysis and the commodification of public discourse. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 133–68.
Fairclough, N. (1995). Media discourse. London: Edward Arnold.
Fairclough, Norman. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical discourse analysis. In T. van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse as social interaction (pp. 258–284). Sage.
Fairclough, N. (2010). General introduction. In Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language. 2nd ed., 1–21. Harlow: Longman.
Fairclough, N., Mulderrig, J. and Wodak, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis, in T. Van Dijk (ed.) Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, pp. 357–378. London: Sage.
Garrett, P., & Bell, A. (1998). Media Discourse: A Critical Overview. In A. Bell, & P. Garrett (Eds.), Approaches to Media Discourse, 1- 20. Oxford: Blackwell.
Gil-Bonilla, J. F. (2020). Critical discourse analysis of Trump across time. Darnioji daugiakalbystė, (16), 1-20.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold/Baltimore: University Park Press.
Halliday, M. A. K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. 2nd ed. London: Arnold. (1994).
Hamed, D. M. (2022). Trump's January 6 address: Hate speech or freedom of speech? A transdisciplinary study. Journal of Humanities and Applied Social Sciences, 4(5), 438-456.
Ibrahim, R. K. (2018). Applying Critical Discourse Analysis Techniques on some Arabic Political Speeches. Journal of Language Studies, 1(2), 17-52.
Igwebuike, E. E. (2018). Discursive strategies and ideologies in selected newspaper reports on the Nigerian-Cameroonian Bakassi peninsula border conflict. Communication and the Public, 3(2), 151-168.
Jahedi, M., Abdullah, F. S., & Mukundan, J. (2014). An overview of focal approaches of critical discourse analysis. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 2(4), 28-35.
Kadim, E. N. (2022). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Trump’s Election Campaign Speeches. Heliyon, 8(4), e09256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09256. Retrieved on December 19, 2023.
Kakisina, P. A., Indhiarti, T. R., & Al Fajri, M. S. (2022). Discursive strategies of Manipulation in COVID-19 political discourse: the case of Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro. SAGE Open, 12(1), 21582440221079884.
Kress, G., and R. Hodge. (1979). Language as ideology. 2nd ed. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul (R. Hodge & G. Kress, 1993). Language as ideology. London: Routledge).
Martin, J. R., & Wodak, R. (2003). Introduction. In J. R. Martin, & R. Wodak (Eds.), Rr/reading The Past: Critical and Functional Perspective on Time and Value (pp. 1-18). Amesterdam: John Benjamins.
Nasih, R. K., & Abboud, Z. A. (2020). A critical discourse analysis of two Iraqi politicians’ speeches in terms of van Dijk’s socio-cognitive model. Journal of Basra researches for Human Sciences, 45(3), 1-16.
Ngân. V.T.H. (2015). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Discursive Strategies Used in Economic News in Economist.Com and Tuoitre.VN. The University of Danang. (Unpublished MA thesis). http://tailieuso.udn.vn/bitstream/TTHL_125/8521/1/VoThiHoangNgan.TT.pdf. Retrieved on January 11, 2024
Rashidi, N., & Souzandehfar, M. (2010). A critical discourse analysis of the debates between Republicans and democrats over the continuation of war in Iraq. Journal of Linguistics and Intercultural Education, 3, 55-82.
Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and discrimination: Rhetorics of racism and antisemitism. London, UK: Routledge.
Rogers, R. (2003). A Critical Discourse Analysis of Family Literacy Practices: Power in and Out of Print. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Simpson, P., & Mayr, A. (2010). Language and Power: A Resource Book for Student. USA: Routledge.
Subtirelu, N. C. (2017). Donald Trump supporters and the denial of racism: An analysis of online discourse in a pro-Trump community. Journal of language aggression and conflict, 5(2), 323-346.
van Dijk, T. A. (1991). Editorial: Discourse analysis with a cause. The Semiotic Review of Books, 2(1), 1–2.
van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 4(2), 249–283.
van Dijk, T. A. (1995). “Aims of Critical Discourse Analysis.” Japanese Discourse, 1, 17-27.
van Dijk, T. A. (1996). Discourse, Power and Access. In C. R. Caldas- Coulthard, & M. Coulthard (Eds.), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis (pp. 84-104). London: Routledge.
van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. Sage.
van Dijk, T. A. (Ed.). (1997). Discourse as social interaction: Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction, Vol. 2. Sage Publications, Inc.
van Dijk, T. A. (2000). “Ideology and Discourse. A Multidisciplinary Introduction.” English version of an internet course for the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC). Retrieved from www.discourses.org. Retrieved on October 9, 2023.
van Dijk, T. A. (2001). Multidisciplinary CDA: A Plea for Diversity. In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis edited by R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 95-120. London: Sage.
vanDijk, T. A. (2003). Critical Discourse Analysis. In D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, & H. E. Hamilton (ed), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 352-371). Maiden, MA: Blackwell.
van Dijk, T. A. (2005). Discourse analysis as ideology analysis. In Language & peace (pp. 41-58). Routledge.
van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Politics, Ideology, and Discourse. Encyclopedia of language and linguistics, Doi: 10.1016/BO-08-044854-2/00722-7. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net. Retriever on February 2, 2024.
van Dijk, T. A. (2015). Critical Discourse Analysis. In The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (2nd ed.) edited by D. Tannen, H. E. Hamilton and D. Schiffrin, 466-485. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.Shakoury (2018).
Waugh, L. R., Catalano, T., Masaeed, K. A., Hong Do, T., & Renigar, P. G. (2016). Critical discourse analysis: Definition, approaches, relation to pragmatics, critique, and trends. Interdisciplinary studies in pragmatics, culture and society, 71-135.
Wetherell, M., Taylor, S., & Yates, S. J. (Eds.). (2001). Discourse as data: A guide for analysis. Sage.
Wodak, R. (ed). (1989). Language, power, and ideology: Studies in political discourse. Vol. 7. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wodak, R. (2001). The discourse-historical approach. In R. Wodak & M. Meyer (Eds.), Methods of CDA (pp. 81–115). Sage.
Wodak, R. (2001). “What CDA is About – a Summary of its History, Important Concepts and its Developments.” In Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, edited by R. Wodak and M. Meyer, 1-13. London: Sage.
