Prosodic Features of Lying: A View From Jordanian Colloquial Arabic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1505.11Keywords:
Forensic Linguistics, Filled Pauses (FPs), lying, deception detectionAbstract
lying is an intentional act of delivering false information to deceive others using language. Examining the linguistic features of this act has been an area of interest for Forensic linguists because of its potential value in investigating various legal contexts such as allegations, testimonies, criminal investigations, and police interrogations. This study aims to explore the relationship between the frequency and duration of Filled pauses (FPs) and lying in Jordanian colloquial Arabic (JAC) and examines their social constraints. To achieve this aim, a corpus of 288 narratives,144 lying and 144 truthful, was collected through face-to-face interviews with 48 speakers stratified by gender, age, and educational attainment. The truthful accounts served as a baseline to detect any change in the pattern of FP frequency and duration in the lying condition. The results obtained from the analysis revealed that lying accounts contained more frequent and longer FPs than truthful accounts, indicating that the frequency of FPs and their duration are potential cues for deception in JAC. In addition, the data showed that the three social factors influence the frequency and duration of FPs when lying. In terms of gender, female deceptive accounts displayed a higher frequency of and longer pauses than males’. With regard to age, the lying narratives of old speakers had the highest frequency and longest FPs among all age groups. As for education, the deceptive narratives of high-educated speakers contained more frequent and longer pauses than their low-educated counterparts.
References
Arciuli, J., Mallard, D., & Villar, G. (2010). “Um, I can tell you’re lying”: Linguistic markers of deception versus truth-telling in speech. Applied Psycholinguistics, 31(3), 397–411. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0142716410000044
Benus, S., Enos, F., Hirschberg, J., & Shriberg, E. (2006). Pauses in deceptive speech. Speech Prosody 2006.
Bortfeld, H., Leon, S. D., Bloom, J. E., Schober, M. F., & Brennan, S. E. (2001). Disfluency rates in conversation: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender. Language and Speech, 44(2), 123–147. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309010440020101
DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129(1), 74–118. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.74
Chen, X., Ita Levitan, S., Levine, M., Mandic, M., & Hirschberg, J. (2020). Acoustic-prosodic and lexical cues to deception and trust: Deciphering how people detect lies. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 8, 199–214. https://doi.org/10.1162/tacl_a_00311
Clark, H. H., & Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition, 84(1), 73–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00017-3
Coulthard, M., & Johnson, A. (2010). The Routledge Handbook of Forensic linguistics. Routledge.
Coulthard, M., Johnson, A., & Wright, D. (2017). An introduction to forensic linguistics: Language in evidence. Routledge.
Fox Tree, J. E. (2002). Interpreting pauses and UMS at turn exchanges. Discourse Processes, 34(1), 37–55. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326950dp3401_2
Guillén-Nieto, V., & Stein, D. (2022). A Lie or Not a Lie, That Is the Question. Trying to Take Arms Against a Sea of Conceptual Troubles: Methodological and Theoretical Issues in Linguistic Approaches to Lie Detection. In V. Guillén-Nieto & D. Stein (Eds.), Language as Evidence: Doing Forensic Linguistics (pp. 131–185). Palgrave Macmillan.
Gósy, M. (2023). Occurrences and durations of filled pauses in relation to words and silent pauses in spontaneous speech. Languages, 8(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.3390/languages8010079
Horn, L. (2017). Telling it slant: Toward a taxonomy of deception. In J. Giltrow & D. Stein (Eds.), The Pragmatic Turn in Law: Inference and Interpretation in Legal Discourse (pp. 23-56). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501504723-002
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press. 266-281.
Levitan, S.I., Maredia, A., & Hirschberg, J. (2018). Linguistic Cues to Deception and Perceived Deception in Interview Dialogues. North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics.
Levitan, S. I., Maredia, A., & Hirschberg, J. (2018). Linguistic Cues to Deception and Perceived Deception in Interview Dialogues. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. [Conference location]. Association for Computational Linguistics.
Mann, S., Vrij, A., & Bull, R. (2004). Detecting true lies: Police officers’ ability to detect suspects’ lies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.137
Masip, J., Sporer, S. L., Garrido, E., & Herrero, C. (2005). The detection of deception with the Reality Monitoring Approach: A review of the empirical evidence. Psychology, Crime & Law, 11(1), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10683160410001726356
Montacié, C., & Caraty, M. (2016). Prosodic Cues and Answer Type Detection for the Deception Sub-Challenge. Interspeech.
Nicklaus, M., & Stein, D. (2022). A Lie or Not a Lie, That Is the Question. Trying to Take Arms Against a Sea of Conceptual Troubles: Methodological and Theoretical Issues in Linguistic Approaches to Lie Detection. In V. Guillén-Nieto & D. Stein (Eds.), Language as Evidence. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84330-4_6
Olsson, J. (2008). Forensic Linguistics: An Introduction to Language, Crime, and the Law. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press.
Rahi, S. (2017). Research design and methods: A systematic review of research paradigms, sampling issues, and instruments development. International Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 6, Article No. 403.
Rose, R. (2017). Silent and filled pauses and speech planning in first and second language production. In Proceedings of DiSS 2017 (pp. 49). Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stenström, A. (1990). Pauses in monologue and dialogue. In J. Svartvik (Ed.), London-Lund Corpus of Spoken English: Description and Research. Lund: Lund University Press.
Tiersma, P. M., & Solan, L. (2002). The linguist on the witness stand: Forensic linguistics in American courts. Language, 78(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2002.0135
Vrij, A., Edward, K., Roberts, K.P. et al. Detecting Deceit via Analysis of Verbal and Nonverbal Behavior. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 24, 239–263 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006610329284
Vrij, A. (2008). Detecting Lies and Deceit: Pitfalls and Opportunities (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Vrij, A., & Semin, G. R. (1996). Lie experts’ beliefs about nonverbal indicators of deception. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 20(1), 65–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02248715
Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1–59). New York: Academic Press.
