Teacher and CEO Job Ads: Metaphor and Framing Analysis

Authors

  • Ivana Marinić Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek
  • Ivana Moritz Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1505.03

Keywords:

metaphor, discourse, job ads, teachers, CEOs

Abstract

According to the Critical Discourse Analysis, language use reflects the power dynamics in various social circumstances. Also, underlying metaphors in the discourse reveal the similarities and differences between the ideas, attitudes, and values of different groups and individuals (Cameron et al., 2009). In this paper, we compare job ads for teachers and CEOs, looking for metaphors and metaphorical frames used to describe perfect candidates. Before that, we provide an analysis of similarities between these two professions and a review of literature discussing the metaphor research on teachers and managers. A couple of interesting conclusions arise. First, there are differences in the self-assumed metaphorical identity of teachers and the metaphors students and works of literature use to describe them. Secondly, in the public discourse, managers’ identity is set in the war metaphor frame, whereas in the leadership theories, they are described either as charismatic or transformational leaders (Storey, 2004a). Finally, our research shows that job ads for CEOs portray the ideal candidates within the charismatic leader frame, leaving out the WAR frame, whereas teacher ads leave out many metaphors that constitute the identity of successful and passionate teachers. This poses the question of why ‘employer branding’ (Backhaus & Tikoo, 2004, p. 501) is not applied to the educational setting and whether this points to the status of these two professions in society.

Author Biographies

Ivana Marinić, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek

Faculty of Education

Ivana Moritz, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek

Faculty of Education

References

Ashcraft, K. L. (2013). The glass slipper: 'Incorporating' occupational identity in management studies. Academy of Management Review, 38(1), 6-31.

Backhaus, K., & Tikoo, S. (2004). Conceptualizing and researching employer branding. Career Development International, 9, 501-517. 10.1108/13620430410550754

Beard, A. (2000). The Language of Politics. Routledge.

Cameron, L., Maslen, R., Todd, Z., Maule, A. J., Straton, P, & Stanley, N. (2009). The Discourse Dynamics Approach to Metaphor and Metaphor-Led Discourse Analysis. Metaphor and Symbol, 24(2), 63-89.

Camp, E. (2009). Two Varieties of Literary Imagination: Metaphor, Fiction, and Thought Experiments. Midwest Studies in Philosophy, XXXIII, 107-130.

Carollo, L., & Guerci, M. (2018). 'Activists in a Suit': Paradoxes and Metaphors in Sustainability Managers' Identity Work. Journal of Business Ethics, 148(2), Thematic Symposium: Paradoxes in Corporate Sustainability - Managing Tensions Between Social, Economic, and Environmental Issues, 249-269.

Casasanto, D., & Gijssels, T. (2015). What makes a metaphor an embodied metaphor? Linguistics Vanguard, 1(1), 327-337. 10.1515/lingvan-2014-1015

Casper, W. J., Holliday Wayne, J., & Manegold, J. G. (2013). Who will we recruit? Targeting deep- and surface-level diversity with human resource policy advertising. Human Resource Management, 52(3), 311-332. 10.1002/hrm.21530

Celani, A., & Singh, P. (2011). Signaling theory and applicant attraction outcomes. Personnel Review, 40(2), 222-238. 10.1108/00483481111106093

Chen, D. D. (2003). A classification system for metaphors about teaching. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 74(2), 24-31.

Fillmore, C. J. (1982). Frame Semantics. In The Linguistic Society of Korea (Eds.) Linguistics in the Morning Calm: Selected Papers from SICOL-1981. Seoul: Hanshin Pub. Co.

Fillmore, C. J., & Baker, C. (2009). A Frames Approach to Semantic Analysis. In B. Heine & H. Narrog (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis (pp. 313-340). Oxford University Press.

Foucault, M. (2010). Truth and Power. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Power: Essential Works of Foucault 1954-1984 (Vol. 3). Penguin Books.

Fruhen, L. S., Weis, L. M., & Flin, R. (2015). Attracting safe employees: How job adverts can affect applicants’ choices. Safety Science, 72, 255-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2014.09.012

Gaucher, D., Friesen, J., & Kay, A. C. (2011). Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101, 109-128. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022530.

Gibbs, R. W., & Perlman, M. (2006). The contested impact of cognitive linguistic research on the psycholinguistics of metaphor understanding. In G. Kristiansen, M. Achard, R. Dirven, & F. J. Ruiz de Mendoza Ibáñez (Eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives (pp. 211-228). Mouton de Gruyter.

Jostmann, N. B., Lakens, D., & Schubert, T. W. (2009). Weight as an embodiment of importance. Psychological Science, 20(9), 1169-1174.

Koller, V. (2004). Businesswomen and war metaphors: ‘Possessive, jealous and pugnacious’? Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8, 3-22. 10.1111/j.1467-9841.2004.00249.x

Kövecses, Z. (2005). Metaphor in culture: Universality and variation. Cambridge University Press.

Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.

Mackenzie, L. (2020). Discriminatory job advertisements for English language teachers in Colombia: An analysis of recruitment biases. TESOL Journal, 12(e535), 1-21.

Muchmore, J. A. (2012). From Laura Ingalls to Wing Biddlebaum: A Survey of Teacher Identities in Works of Literature. Issues in Teacher Education, 21(2), 5-20.

Nowakowski, I. (2020). How does Google do that? - about the employer branding in the company with the world's highest valued brand. LinkedIn. Retrieved September 1, 2023, from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/how-does-google-do-employer-branding-company-worlds-nowakowski/

Oxford, R. L., Tomlinson, S., Barcelos, A., Harrington, C., Lavine, R. Z., Saleh, A., & Longhini, A. (1998). Clashing metaphors about classroom teachers: toward a systematic typology for the language teaching field. System, 26(1), 3-50.

Pavičić Takač, V., & Molnar, D. (2009). Concepts we learn by, concepts we teach by. In M. Brdar, M. Omazić, & V. Pavičić Takač (Eds.), Cognitive Approaches to English: Fundamental, Methodological, Interdisciplinary and Applied Aspects (pp. 385-401). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

Ramsay, G. M. (2008). Shaping Minds: A Discourse Analysis of Chinese-language Community Mental Health Literature. John Benjamins Pub.

Saban, A., Kocbeker, B. N., & Saban, A. (2007). Prospective teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphor analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 123-139.

Schildkrout, A. (2015). How teachers and CEOs are alike. EducationWeek. https://www.edweek.org/teaching-learning/opinion-how-teachers-and-ceos-are-alike/2015/03. Retrieved Februar 1st, 2024.

Steen, G. J., Reijnierse, W. G., & Burgers, C. (2014). When Do Natural Language Metaphors Influence Reasoning? A Follow-Up Study to Thibodeau and Boroditsky (2013). PLoS ONE, 9(12), 1-25. 10.1371/journal.pone. 0113536

Storey, J. (2004a). Changing theories of leadership and leadership development. In J. Storey (Ed.), Leadership in Organizations: Current issues and key trends (pp. 11-38). Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.

Storey, J. (2004b). Signs of change: ‘damned rascals’ and beyond. In Leadership in Organizations: Current issues and key trends (pp. 2-10). Routledge.

Štrkalj Despot, K., & Ostroški Anić, A. (2021). A war on war metaphor: Metaphorical framings in Croatian discourse on Covid-19. Rasprave, 47(1), 173-208.

Taylor, T., Turgeon, B., & Gross, C. L. (2018). Helpers “Here on the Front Lines”. Symbolic Interaction, 41(1), 45-61.

Thomas, L., Wareing, S., Singh, I., Stilwell Peccei, J., Thornborrow, J., & Jones, J. (2004). Language, Society and Power: An Introduction (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Wessel, J. L., Hagiwara, N., Ryan, A. M., & Kermond, C. M.Y. (2015). Should Women Applicants “Man Up” for Traditionally Masculine Fields? Effectiveness of Two Verbal Identity Management Strategies. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 39(2), 243-255. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684314543265

Wille, L., & Derous, E. (2018). When Job Ads Turn You Down: How Requirements in Job Ads May Stop Instead of Attract Highly Qualified Women. Sex Roles, 79(7-8), 464-475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0877-1

Williams, L. E., & Bargh, J. A. (2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322(5901), 606-607. 10.1126/science.1162548

Xiong, H., Li, L., & Qu, Y. (2015). Exploring EFL Teachers’ Cognitive Models Through Metaphor Analysis. SAGE Open, 5(4), 1-11. 10.1177/2158244015608900

Downloads

Published

2025-05-01

Issue

Section

Articles